Over the past decade, scholarships have become a critical component of a student's overall financial aid package. According to one report, more than $7 billion in scholarships and grants are awarded each year. Scholarships can come in many forms. Some scholarships are publicly available, through various websites and products, and are independent of the enrolling institution. These “external scholarships” typically require minimal effort to incorporate into a student’s final award package.
Another significant category of scholarships is institute-funded, often provided by donors who establish criteria and partner with institutional endowments to distribute them to students. These scholarships are fully maintained and processed by an institution. Given the importance of these “institutional scholarships” in making tuition affordable, their distribution places an increased burden on campus financial aid and advancement offices. Scholarship management systems have become critical tools for maintaining, distributing, and prioritizing this source of tuition funding. I've found that there's not a lot of common understanding of what these systems can do and what institutions should look for when considering a system.
Institutions have hundreds of institutional scholarships, each with its own specific rules and criteria. These rules can be as simple as a student's major or GPA, or as complex or subjective as scoring an essay explaining why a student should receive the scholarship. Maintaining these scholarships is extremely time-consuming and dependent on individual administrators.
Through my conversations, I have found that the involvement of students in the award process varies wildly. Some institutions automatically consider students for scholarships, while others require lengthy forms that collect information already maintained by the institution (i.e. GPA or major). Ideally, the process would be frictionless for students, with minimal reliance on them.
With scholarship data and student information in the system, the next major step is to quickly match students to scholarships. Typically, this is a manual process, whereas conversations with some institutions have revealed that effective, systematic solutions can increase productivity by more than 50%.
Advancement office teams are critical to the overall scholarship management process. They often maintain donor relationships and drive fundraising efforts to increase institutional scholarships. Scholarship management systems should address their needs to enable continued engagement with donors and drive further value.
Flexibility, simplicity, and impact are essential when assessing technical scholarship solutions.
A reliable system like Scholarship Magic drives insights and automation, resulting in streamlined processes, enhanced donor engagement, informed decision-making, and long-term financial sustainability. By leveraging such capabilities, institutions can maximize funding opportunities and strengthen relationships within their academic community, ensuring a positive impact for donors, students, and financial aid teams alike.